Related links
- Example of a self-identification survey
Collecting employment equity data about your workforce is the first of the nine employment equity requirements. It informs your entire program and all your planning. The best way to collect employment equity information from your staff is the self-identification survey.
A self-identification survey allows employers to determine which employees self-identified as members of one or more of the “designated groups”: women, Indigenous people, members of racialized groups and/or people with disabilities.
The Employment Equity Act and regulations specify some important requirements which must be communicated to employees either in the survey or in a notice attached to it:
Employers can make it mandatory for every employee to complete and return the survey. However, an employer cannot compel someone to self-identify as a member of designated group and cannot identify an employee as a member of a designated group without their consent. It is not enough for a self-identification question to include as a possible answer “prefer not to say”. Employers must also clearly indicate in the survey itself that self-identification is voluntary.
Employers must indicate in the survey itself that the information collected is confidential and will only be used by, or be disclosed to, other persons within the organization, in order for the organization to carry out its obligations under the Employment Equity Act.
Employers must notify employees that they can change the information they submitted in the survey at any time.
Employers must notify employees either in the survey itself or in a notice accompanying the survey that they can self-identify as being a member of more than one designated group.
The survey must clearly indicated that it is available in an alternate format upon request. An alternate format is a medium and/or methodology adapted to a person's disability that allows this person to effectively access the information communicated in the original format. Some examples are Braille, ASCII text, large print and recorded audio.
By law, the survey must “contain the definitions members of visible minorities, persons with disabilities and aboriginal peoples set out in section 3 of the Act” (See example of self-identification survey in the related links sections). However, the Employment Equity Act also expressly permits flexibility in terms of the expressions used [Regulations, s. 3 (2) & (3)] and also permits employers to ask additional questions with respect to employment equity [Regulations, s. 3 (5)].
This flexibility enables employers to use more modern language and explore issues which may not have been as well understood at the time the Employment Equity Act was passed. By taking advantage of this flexibility employers can promote higher rates of self-identification among employees. However, employers are cautioned to seek input from members of designated groups and/or seek expert advice on how to update expressions.
Language about identity has evolved since the passage of the Employment Equity Act. Some of the terms used in the legislation (e.g. “visible minority” and “Aboriginal”) are no longer commonly used, and may indeed be offensive to members of the designated groups. As long as the terms are defined in a way that is consistent with the Employment Equity Act, employers are encouraged to consider using more modern expressions. For example, instead of referring to “members of visible minorities” in the survey employers might consider “racialized people”, or “people of colour.” Instead of referring to “Aboriginal” people, the survey may refer instead to Indigenous peoples.
However, should an employer choose to use more modern language, it is very important that they:
The Employment Equity Act expressly permits employers to collect additional information about employment equity in their surveys. There are potential benefits to doing so. The understanding of equity and diversity has evolved over time. It is now generally accepted, for example, that not all people within a “group” experience disadvantages and discrimination to the same level or in the same way. A survey that captures information about “sub-groups” may therefore assist an employer, and the Commission, to better understand obstacles.
On the other hand, employers may want to consider the value of collecting additional information. For example, although Statistics Canada collects information about race at the “subgroup” level, that level of information is not available in WEIMS.
Finally, should employers choose to ask additional information beyond that required by the Employment Equity Act they must clearly explain:
Activities related to conducting the workforce survey should have a strategic link to the organization's mission, vision and business plans to foster a human rights culture. To do so, the organization could:
Over the course of many years, the Commission has audited many employers and identified activities that although not required can be very effective at promoting equality in the workplace, including adequate representation of the members of the designated groups. Here are some examples:
For various reasons, some employment equity designated group members are hesitant to self-identify. These reasons include privacy concerns; a fear that disclosure may have a negative impact on them (e.g. disclosing a non-visible disability); the perception that they are not being evaluated based on merit; and the fact that they consider themselves Canadians. Therefore, it is important that your organization choose a method to conduct its workforce survey that suits the type of work being performed, respects the organization's culture, and is welcoming and convenient for employees. One organization conducted a “Census Day” where senior management informed employees about its commitment and obligations under the Employment Equity Act and encouraged them to complete the survey.
It is important that managers and supervisors do not have access to the information about individual employees, including that data be reported to them in aggregate form only so that no individual may be identified. Employees need to know that they have control over when and how their self-identification data is used.
To gain the trust and the participation from the employees during the self-identification survey process, some organizations ensure that management and bargaining agents collaborate so the plans and follow-up surrounding the workforce survey are communicated to all employees and are well understood.
Although the completion of the self-identification survey relating to the four designated groups is voluntary, some organizations make the return of the survey form mandatory. When new employees are hired, the organization includes the survey form in the new hire or orientation package of the documents to be returned to the organization.
In the private sector, organizations use the Workplace Equity Information Management System provided by Employment and Social Development Canada to incorporate all data about employment equity and the workforce.